was something strange in this blog the role of the SPD in connection with Stuttgart 21 yes several occasions the topic. It has been discussed that the SPD has a People's Party and the natural counterpart of the CDU on the subject failed Stuttgart 21 total. Because instead of intelligent alternatives to the CDU project Stuttgart 21 show that the SPD has just agreed to this project.
In connection with the ongoing election campaign now in Baden-Württemberg rub your eyes again, surprised by the SPD. The SPD is silent on the largely Stuttgart 21. Here Stuttgart 21 if not the most important, yet a very important issue for the forthcoming elections in Baden-Wuerttemberg. As for the SPD with its intended course of action?
For a variety of messages and reports can be concluded about the relationship of the SPD to Stuttgart 21:
- The leadership of the country-SPD calls for Stuttgart 21.
- Large parts of the SPD are based against Stuttgart 21
- The SPD wants to lead a government contribution to the state election a referendum to Stuttgart 21. Prior to the referendum, however, should be promoted Stuttgart 21. Unclear are the conditions for the referendum. There is a risk that the SPD, the boundary conditions for the referendum so firmly states that a rejection of the project can be achieved only with difficulty.
On election advertising that you get from the SPD, despite these highly explosive Stuttgart 21 - no matter to find on the subject. Can the citizens do not know how the SPD is to Stuttgart 21?
example, in a display sheet of Stuttgart city district were presented to the candidates for the Stuttgart constituencies I and IV. In the constituency I run for the SPD Mr. Martin grains. Mr. grains is regarded as supporters of Stuttgart 21 He has even been to a Pro-Stuttgart 21 - Jubilee event at Stuttgart Marktplatz a fiery speech on Stuttgart 21 held. In the introductory statements to Mr. Grains is certainly not a word to read Stuttgart 21. Shame on Mr. grains for his opinion about Stuttgart 21? Or will choose Mr. grains that he also people who are for the expansion of the rail junction etappierbaren Stuttgart on the basis of the existing terminal station?
Another example: a few days before the general election campaign brochure of the SPD fluttered in the mailbox. This catalog is very extensive, several DIN A 4 - pages printed front and back. But here, too: a word to Stuttgart 21
But somewhere it must be something in this comprehensive brochure about traffic! After a long search we find in fact two half-sentences for On transport. Under the heading "So we want" is a 4th Item listed: "bravely tackle infrastructure projects to invest in a targeted and sustainable road and rail"
At first glance, these sentences are meaningless. At second glance, one is suspicious. Which means: the infrastructure projects to address vigorously? Will the SPD reduce public participation in future rather than expand it?
And now. If the SPD against Stuttgart but 21? Because this film is a "sustainable investment in the rail". Stuttgart 21 is anything but a sustainable project.
For it is not sustainable if
- the negative impacts during construction of Stuttgart 21 are so large that it by any positive impact during the subsequent operation can never be recouped more
- caused by Stuttgart 21, that in the next 15 years sufficient investment for the urgent transfer freight to rail are available,
- through Stuttgart 21, a functioning railway junction is replaced by a bottleneck that prevents
- through Stuttgart 21 during the next 15 years investing in a civil car in BW be
- the residents of the Neckar valley, the Fils Valley and the Rems valley will be impacted by increasing rail freight more and more because Stuttgart 21 investments in such short ring road tunnel prevented for freight
- of environmentally harmful traffic through Stuttgart 21 is encouraged, will increase
- fares as a result of long tunnels and thus a strong migration from the train back to the car occurs,
- destroyed in the most polluted with fine city of Germany is a central park area ..... etc. etc.
why we demand that the SPD: out with it, away with the game of hide. After the election we will get around to mentioning the "sustainable investment in the railways.
0 comments:
Post a Comment